Drawing for PROTECTOR

USPTO serial 74724270

PROTECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, JR. JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017flexible hose in the 3A, FDA and USDA regulated sanitary transport industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 29, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 29, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 13, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 28, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 29, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance