Drawing for DIETARY PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 74725689

DIETARY PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIETARY PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services targeted to the health care industry to efficiently manage their food service departments and to efficiently purchase food service productsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance