USPTO serial 74725914
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MURRAY M. LOECHER
MURRAY M LOECHER130 PRINCE STNEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's apparel, namely, shirts, blouses, dresses, shorts, pants, jeans, skirts, blazers, T-shirts, sleepwear, socks, ties, coats, scarves, vests and athletic wear, namely, headbands, sweatbands, body suits, gym shorts, gym suits, jogging suits, jumpsuits, leotards, and warm-up suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of exhibitions, shows and displays by video, laser disc, audio and computer generated productions in the field of promotion of consumer products, goods and services for others and distribution services for others through cable television programming, television and radio programming and internet programming across local, national and worldwide information networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |