USPTO serial 74726044
USER TESTED UNIVERSAL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY THE INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USER TESTED UNIVERSAL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY THE INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W WHITAKER RAYNER
STEPHAN LAND MCDAVID MAYO MCDAVID PLLCP O BOX 1456OXFORD, MS 38655-1456UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | household appliances, electronic products, entertainment products, home furnishings, assistive devices, closet, cabinet and storage systems, toilet and bath accessories, telephones and telephone accessories, computer equipment and peripherals, indoor/outdoor lawn and garden tools and implements, outdoor furnishings, plumbing and lighting fixtures, kitchen accessories, swimming pools, spas, hot tubs, hydrotherapy and aquatic exercise equipment, optical products and writing equipment that are accommodating and adaptable to people with differing abilities | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Technology Development
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Technology Development
- Other trademarks in Class A
- Similar marks named USER TESTED UNIVERSAL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY THE INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1999 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |