Drawing for HEALTHY CHOICE

USPTO serial 74726327

HEALTHY CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Stephenson

PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029canned fruit; cooking oil; cottage cheese; dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; French fried potatoes; frozen processed potatoes; jams and jellies; peanut butter; poultry; prepared refrigerated entrees consisting primarily of meat; salad oil; sour cream, vegetable oil; whipping cream; yogurt; non-dairy creamer; prepared side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables; and salads consisting of fruit or vegetables; and puddingsACTIVE—
030popped popcorn; mayonnaise; salad dressings; salad dressing mixes; salads consisting primarily of macaroni, pasta or rice; frozen and packaged add meat entrees consisting primarily of macaroni, pasta or rice with vegetables and/or sauces; seasoned coating mixes for meat, fish and/or poultry; crackers; syrup toppings for ice cream; frozen cakes and pies; frozen yogurt; gravy; gravy mixes; hamburger sandwiches; meat pies; oatmeal; pasta; prepared side dishes consisting of pasta or rice; ravioli; sandwiches; sauces; seasonings; seasoning blend mixes; spaghetti and meatballs; spices; tartar sauce; and tomato sauceACTIVE—
032fruit and vegetable juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2001EX4MSOU EXTENSION 4 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Aug 17, 2001EX4DSOU EXTENSION 4 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Feb 24, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Aug 29, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 6, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 20, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance