Drawing for THE PERFECT FIT FOR PETITES

USPTO serial 74727014

THE PERFECT FIT FOR PETITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CATALDO, PETER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT FIT FOR PETITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr.

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR745 S 23RD ST STE 300ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail women's clothing store services, excluding shoe store servicesABANDONEDFeb 28, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance