USPTO serial 74727026
HOBBY WOOD CLEAR PINE SCROLL PROJECTS CRAFTS TURNING SQUARES WOOD BURNING MOUNTAIN WEST MILLWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOBBY WOOD CLEAR PINE SCROLL PROJECTS CRAFTS TURNING SQUARES WOOD BURNING MOUNTAIN WEST MILLWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STUART S BOWIE
206 KNOLL RDWALLINGFORD, PA 19086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | precut wood for scroll projects, turning squares, crafts and wood burning and for constructing other wood structures for home, office and commercial use | ABANDONED | Aug 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |