USPTO serial 74727724
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
IAWS TECHNOLOGY AND GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED
DUBLIN 24, IE
Other trademarks owned by IAWS TECHNOLOGY AND GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED
Dublin 24, IE
Dublin 24, IE
Dublin 24, IE
ARYZTA FOOD SOLUTIONS IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY
CLONDALKIN, DUBLIN, IE
Other trademarks owned by ARYZTA FOOD SOLUTIONS IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY
IAWS TECHNOLOGY & GLOBAL SERVICES
DUBLIN 22, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
Bruce W. McKee McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC801 Grand Avenue, Suite 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | partially and fully prepared bakery products, namely, croissants, baguettes, bread, biscuits, cakes and pastries all made according to traditional French recipes sold only to retail stores for further processing | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |