USPTO serial 74727922
CHECKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHECKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATAN EPSTEIN, ESQ.
NATAN EPSTEIN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF NATAN EPSTEINTRIDENT CTR 9TH FL11377 WESTY OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies | ACTIVE | Oct 24, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |