Drawing for FOOD MAKES ME HAPPY

USPTO serial 74727989

FOOD MAKES ME HAPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD MAKES ME HAPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR J BOUSEL

3270 N LAKESHORE DR APT 9 ECHICAGO, IL 60657UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030mayonnaise; salad dressing; relish; condiments, namely, mustard, ketchup, marinades, seasonings and spices; bakery goods, namely, cookies, bread, rolls, bagels, croissants, biscuits, cakes, pastry, pies, doughnuts, muffins, and pie crusts; crackers; candy mints; refrigerated cookie dough; cake mixes; cake frosting; puddings; flavored and sweetened gelatin; candy; chewing gum; cocoa; chocolate; coffee; coffee substitutes; tea; sugar; molasses; honey; maple syrup; flour; processed cereals; pasta; rice; pizza; quiche; meat pies; processed breakfast cereals; yeast; baking powder; natural sweeteners; ice cream; flavored ices; topping syrups; food flavorings and extracts, being non-essential oils, used as food flavorings; pretzels; corn chips; tortilla chips; popped popcorn; salsa; sauces, namely, picante sauce, barbecue sauce, taco sauce, pizza sauce, steak sauce, tomato sauce, spaghetti sauce, chili sauce, seafood sauce, hot sauce, soy sauce, teriyaki sauce, oriental seasoning sauce; Mexican sauces; and curry sauce; gravy; salt; pepper; vinegar; frozen and/or packaged dinner entrees consisting primarily of pasta; and breakfast entrees consisting primarily of pancakes, French toast, waffles, filled breads and/or biscuitsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 15, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 21, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance