USPTO serial 74728034
TELECHRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELECHRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. W. Knox
RICHARD E W KNOX23586 CALABASAS RDSTE 203CALABASAS, CA 91302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | software-driven device which can be programmed remotely to route telephone calls placed by its user via the least cost telephone services, carrier, calculating such cost sensitive criteria as geographic location of the device, time of day, day of week, and destination of the telephone call; additionally, the device is capable of calculating and tabulating, on a real-time basis, telephone communications expenditures and various useage characteristics of a particular user | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | software-driven device which can be programmed remotely to route telephone calls placed by its user via the least cost telephone services, carrier, calculating such cost sensitive criteria as geographic location of the device, time of day, day of week, and destination of the telephone call; additionally, the device is capable of calculating and tabulating, on a real-time basis, telephone communications expenditures and various useage characteristics of a particular user | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |