USPTO serial 74728437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Ferrara
RICHARD P FERRARA FISH & RICHARDSON, PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | investing the funds of others in securities and real estate; and for broker-dealer services with respect to unit investment trusts, mutual funds, variable insurance and annuity contracts, limited partnerships, precious metal certificates, and stocks and bonds | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 4, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |