Drawing for MASSMUTUAL THE BLUE CHIP COMPANY

USPTO serial 74728437

MASSMUTUAL THE BLUE CHIP COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASSMUTUAL THE BLUE CHIP COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard P. Ferrara

RICHARD P FERRARA FISH & RICHARDSON, PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036investing the funds of others in securities and real estate; and for broker-dealer services with respect to unit investment trusts, mutual funds, variable insurance and annuity contracts, limited partnerships, precious metal certificates, and stocks and bondsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 4, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 4, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 21, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 20, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 9, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 16, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance