Drawing for LAUDEN

USPTO serial 74728442

LAUDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA L. BERKOWITZ

LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009radios with clocks, radio cassette players with clocks, portable radios, radios with lamps and clocks, radios with telephones and clocks, portable radio cassette recorder with clock, stereos with turntables and cassettes, stereos with CD players and cassettes, alarm clock radios, telephone clock radios, computer hardware, computer software used for document management, electrically heated hair curlers, and electric ironsACTIVE—
010electric massagersACTIVE—
011electric lamps, lamp clock radios, electric coffee machines for domestic use, electric toasters, electric sandwich makers, electric fan heaters, portable electric heaters, and hand held electric hair dryersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 8, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 15, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance