USPTO serial 74729015
COMANCHE CREEK RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMANCHE CREEK RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA PAGUET
PATRICIA PAGUET LIDDELL SAPP ZIVLEY HILL & LABOON600 TRAVIS STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wine | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |