Drawing for BABY BELL

USPTO serial 74729209

BABY BELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY BELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Welch

JOHN L WELCH DIKE, BRONSTEIN, ROBERTS & CUSHMAN130 WATER STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio tape recorders, blenders, calculators, cameras and accessories, compact disc players, computers, computer monitors, computer peripherals, dictating machines, electric can openers, electric coffee grinders, electric coffee makers, electric expresso machines, electric hair trimmers, electric kettles, electric razors, electric toothbrushes, electric woks, eyeglasses, facsimiles machines, food processors, food mixers, personal message beepers, phonographs, radios, stereo sets, sunglasses, tape recorders, telephones, telephone answering machines, visions, video cameras, and video recordersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1996LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance