Drawing for OPTABUNS

USPTO serial 74729356

OPTABUNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTABUNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua G. Gigger

Joshua G. Gigger Stoel Rives LLP201 South Main Street, Suite 1100Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030mixes for bread-based bakery productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 30, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 19, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance