USPTO serial 74729459
ROUTE 66
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUTE 66?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Backpacks, carry-on bags, book bags, school bags, tote bags, travel bags, billfolds, toiletry cases sold empty; clutch purses, change purses, wallets, handbags, shoulder bags, fanny packs, waist packs, luggage, luggage tags, key cases, and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |