Drawing for ULTRASIZER

USPTO serial 74729901

ULTRASIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ULTRASIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Titley

ROBERT L TITLEY QUARLES & BRADY411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009scientific and laboratory instruments for particle size distribution measuring, particle counting, zeta potential measuring, electrophoretic mobility measuring, particle mobility measuring, environmental monitoring (temperature and humidity), pH measuring, producing zimm plots to determine the molecular weight of polymers, namely, air and liquid particle counters, photo correlation spectroscopy instruments, micro electrophoresis measuring instruments, acoustic spectroscopy instruments, laser diffraction measuring instruments; apparatus for preparing samples, suspensions, sprays, and emulsions of particles for use with any of the aforesaid goods, namely, sample dispersion units, stirred cells, autosamplers, dry powder feeders, dispensers, auto titrators, nebulizers, ultrasonic baths, and temperature controllers; computers and microprocessors, computer printers, computer software for controlling and operating all of the aforesaid goods; machine readable data carriers, namely, floppy discs, CD-ROMs, optical discs, magnetic tapes, all for use with the foregoing goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 1997ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 27, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance