USPTO serial 74730235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Westlake Vilage, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence M. Adelman
LAWRENCE M ADELMAN LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE M ADELMANWARNER CTR BUSINESS PARK5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6597| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | newsletters, reports and synopses in the field of financial and investment services and affairs | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 1995 |
| 036 | financial consulting and investment services; electronic and telecommunication transmission of financial and investment data and information | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 1995 |
| 042 | general and sports news provided via telecommunication transmission and electronic means | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |