USPTO serial 74730388
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rochester, NY
DEAN SPECIALTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN SPECIALTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Rochester, NY
DEAN SPECIALTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by DEAN SPECIALTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES, L.P.
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIDGET GRIFFIN JOHNSON
BRIDGET GRIFFIN JOHNSON DEAN FOODS COMPANY2515 MCKINNEY AVE STE 1200DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | pickles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |