Drawing for CRYSTALCLEAR

USPTO serial 74730576

CRYSTALCLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2060485Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 13, 1997
Examiner
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CRYSTALCLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. R. Duke Taylor / Geoffrey D. Aurini

W. R. Duke Taylor / Geoffrey D. Aurini Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001enzyme and bacteria solution for use in digesting organic waste and lowering ammonia and nitrate levels in ponds and water gardensACTIVEJul 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 24, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 24, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2017RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 22, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 8, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
May 13, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 7, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 7, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 7, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
May 11, 200789AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
May 11, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 5, 2006CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Nov 17, 2004CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 25, 2004C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Apr 14, 2004PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 22, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 22, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 6, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 6, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 6, 2003CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
May 13, 2003815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
May 12, 2003E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2001PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 13, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 14, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance