Drawing for FARM BUREAU ONLINE A SERVICE OF THE AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION

USPTO serial 74731073

FARM BUREAU ONLINE A SERVICE OF THE AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARM BUREAU ONLINE A SERVICE OF THE AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038electronic mail servicesACTIVE—
041computer education and training coursesACTIVE—
042interactive communication services, namely, providing computer bulletin boards in a wide variety of fields, hosting computer chat rooms, conducting non-business public opinion polls and questionnaires, and providing late breaking news, providing multiple user access to a global computer information network and providing access to and administering other computer networks providing for the availability, transfer, exchange, and dissemination of a wide variety of information, including a homepage on global and other computer networks, linkage services to homepages and databases on global and other computer networks, and leasing access time to computer databases in a wide variety of subject areasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 7, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance