USPTO serial 74731554
ENTERPRISE DBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2082590Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 1997
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENTERPRISE DBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PRISCILLA L. DUNCKEL
PRISCILLA L. DUNCKEL BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.2001 ROSS AVENUESUITE 600DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in database design, implementation, administration and management; database query and reporting; client/server computing applications, and for programming and application development, and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 21, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |