Drawing for DESTRUCTION DERBY

USPTO serial 74731639

DESTRUCTION DERBY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2369636Status 701Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2000
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.

Status 701: Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary.

Need help with DESTRUCTION DERBY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Arkowitz

Jennifer D. Arkowitz KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900San Francisco, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive computer and video game programs[, computer game and video game machines for use with televisions ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 11, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2020RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 31, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 31, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 2, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 4, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 3, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 201089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jul 26, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2007C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 8, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2007REINREINSTATED—
Apr 28, 2007C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 24, 2007815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 25, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 31, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance