USPTO serial 74732011
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GREAT CANADIAN WATER CO. LTD., THE
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6P 4Z9, CA
Other trademarks owned by GREAT CANADIAN WATER CO. LTD., THE
GREAT CANADIAN WATER CO. LTD., THE
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6P 4Z9, CA
Other trademarks owned by GREAT CANADIAN WATER CO. LTD., THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Hudson
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGEP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beverages, namely, fruit and herbal flavoured non-alcoholic beverages; water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |