Drawing for HUNTINGTON VISUAL LOCKBOX

USPTO serial 74732202

HUNTINGTON VISUAL LOCKBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2565446Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 30, 2002
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HUNTINGTON VISUAL LOCKBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Morgan

Robert J. Morgan PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR LLP41 SOUTH HIGH STREET, 29TH FLOORCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial information provided by electronic meansSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 16, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2022CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 30, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 7, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 7, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 7, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 7, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 6, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 14, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 17, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 20, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 15, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 2, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 1998PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
May 8, 1998PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 8, 1998PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance