Drawing for LONGABERGER GREENHOUSE

USPTO serial 74732209

LONGABERGER GREENHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LONGABERGER GREENHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen K. Hammond

KAREN K HAMMOND PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR41 S HIGH STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008hand tools for gardening, namely, trowels, hoes, rakes, clippers, shears, pruners, spades, shovels and edgersACTIVE—
025clothing items, namely T-shirts, sweatshirts, hats, and smocksACTIVE—
031dried flower arrangements and wreaths, flower bulbs, and live plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Jan 29, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 29, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Aug 25, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 25, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 1996DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance