Drawing for ARCADIA

USPTO serial 74732443

ARCADIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, ERNESTO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCADIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet M. Sinton

HARRIET M SINTON SEIDEL GONDA LAVORGNA & MONACO PCSTE 1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, lip gloss, nail polish remover, nail cuticle cream, eye make-up remover; soaps, namely, bar soap, foam bath, body wash, bath beads, bath oil, bath salts; shower gels; body powder; baby powder; hand and body lotion; foot lotion; skin cream, and toiletries, namely, shampoo, conditioner, body spray cologne, body cologne splash, talc, hair styling sprays, hair styling gels, hair styling liquids, facial scrub, and foot scrubACTIVE—
021bath accessories, namely, brushes, sponges, loofah, body scrubbers, back scrubbers and foot scrubbersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 9, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 16, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 19, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance