USPTO serial 74732464
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
C.P. 06599, Mexico City, MX
Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
C.P. 06599, Mexico City, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones, cellular telephones, and telephone apparatus, namely, intercoms, telephone receivers, telephone transmitters, telephone wire, elbow rests for use with telephones, blank audio discs, blank video discs, blank optical discs, prepaid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; computers, data processors, and coin-operated vending machines and mechanisms therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | promotional marketing programs in the field of telecommunications; telemarketing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | cellular telephone services, telephone communication, electronic transmission, of data and documents via computer terminals, electronic mail services, electronic store and forward messaging, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone paging services, rental of telephones and facsimile machines, audio and video teleconferencing, voice mail services, voice-activated dialing services, and teletext services, long distance telephone services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |