Drawing for FRESH & HOLESOME

USPTO serial 74732657

FRESH & HOLESOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARD, JENNIFER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH & HOLESOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030bagels, bread, bagel chips and bakery productsABANDONEDNov 13, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1996AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 12, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance