USPTO serial 74732670
GREAT WHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREAT WHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN, DEBAETS, ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper note cubes, re-positional notepad paper, easel pads, flip chart paper refills, wire bound notebooks, white plastic film for single side printing, glossy coated cover paper stock, file dividers, paper dividers, notebook dividers, adding machine paper rolls, calendars, desk and daily planners, index cards, pressure sensitive blank paper labels, desk pads, business cards, file folders, custom printed forms, filler paper and tablet paper | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |