Drawing for POLYMETRICS

USPTO serial 74732705

POLYMETRICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2202428Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 1998
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with POLYMETRICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER C LANDO

PETER C LANDO WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ozone generators for water processing, purification, and other industrial and commercial uses; water purification units for industrial useSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 1982
035management of industrial water purification systems and facilitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 1979
037construction, maintenance, and repair of industrial water purification systems and facilitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 1979
040industrial water purification system leasing servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 1979
042engineering and custom design services with respect to industrial water purification and treatment facilitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2005C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Nov 10, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 5, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 22, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance