USPTO serial 74732946
NULINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NULINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW1V 3JL, GB
London SW1V 3JL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H HOLT
WILLIAM H HOLT LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM H HOLTUNIT 2 1ST FL1423 POWHATAN STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | pipes for carrying fluids; pipe stoppers for stopping the flow of fluid in a pipe; pipe seals for preventing the flow of a fluid in a pipe either temporarily or permanently; pipe couplings; glands for preventing fluid leakage along or about a movable shaft, rod or the like | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | situ repair and/or refurbishment of fluid service pipes and piping, namely, lining, rehabilitating, renewing or replacing fluid service pipes or piping in situ | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |