USPTO serial 74733206
L.A. MEX GRANDE FOOD!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 1997
- Examiner
- CALDERON, ANNA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with L.A. MEX GRANDE FOOD!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Clearwater, FL
Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Clearwater, FL
Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward B. Chansky
Edward B. Chansky GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP10845 Griffith Peak Drive Ste. 600Las Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named L.A. MEX GRANDE FOOD!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |