USPTO serial 74733432
SYSTEMWIZARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2161187Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 1998
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYSTEMWIZARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWTON, MA
Natick, MA
Natick, MA
Natick, MA
NEWTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alla Ilchenko
Alla Ilchenko Rocket Software Inc77 Fourth Ave.Waltham, MA 02451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | personal computer-based computer software provided to original equipment manufacturers that detects, diagnoses, and corrects personal computer usage and configuration problems at the user's personal computer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKET SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SystemSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SystemSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SystemSoft Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKET SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SYSTEMWIZARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 9, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |