USPTO serial 74733560
USANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN M WHEBLE
KATHRYN M WHEBLE COOLEY GODWARD LLP1 MARITIME PLZ FL 20SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple user access to global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 16, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |