USPTO serial 74733856
TUF DUCK CENTURION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 1997
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUF DUCK CENTURION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lincoln, NE
CENTURION WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LINCOLN, NE
Other trademarks owned by CENTURION WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Lincoln, NE
Lincoln, NE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT S HAVLICK
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC7700 BONHOMME, STE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Centurion International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTURION WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Centurion International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Centurion International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TUF DUCK CENTURION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 21, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |