USPTO serial 74733860
PCBANC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PCBANC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Carney
VINCENT L CARNEYP O BOX 80836LINCOLN, NE 68501-0836UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software program for use in banking via personal computer | ABANDONED | Aug 28, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |