Drawing for SAY YES

USPTO serial 74734367

SAY YES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAY YES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney M. Anderson

RODNEY M ANDERSON ANDERSON, LEVINE & LINTEL LLPSTE 65014785 PRESTON RDDALLAS, TX 75254

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fat-free dairy products, namely milk, chocolate milk, cream, eggnog, yoghurt, butter and cheeseABANDONED—
030ice cream and frozen confectionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 16, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 8, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance