Drawing for Serial No. 74734496

USPTO serial 74734496

Serial No. 74734496

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74734496?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Hieken

CHARLES HIEKEN, FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009loudspeaker systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 8, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 25, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance