USPTO serial 74734496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Hieken
CHARLES HIEKEN, FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | loudspeaker systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |