USPTO serial 74734853
PET-PROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PET-PROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Kondracki
EDWARD J KONDRACKI KERKAM, STOWELL, KONDRACKI & CLARKE, PCTWO SKYLINE PL STE 6005203 LEESBURG PIKEFALLS CHURCH, VA 22041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | textile floor coverings for residential applications, namely, carpets for kitchens, playrooms, dens, family and other home recreational areas | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |