USPTO serial 74734948
INTERNET LIQUIDATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNET LIQUIDATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G SMITH
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computer online retail services featuring a wide range of consumer products and general merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNET LIQUIDATORS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BID.COM INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BID.COM INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INTERNET LIQUIDATORS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |