Drawing for M SPORT

USPTO serial 74735420

M SPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M SPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman H. Zivin

NORMAN H ZIVIN COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025men's, women's and children's athletic wear and sportswear, namely knit tops, knit shorts, knit pants, fleece tops, fleece shorts, fleece pants, jogging suits, socks and shoesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 1, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance