USPTO serial 74735428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Burpee
CHARLES E BURPEE WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP900 OLD KENT BLDG111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2489| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | railroad track maintenance machines, namely, the removers and inserters, tie cranes, spreaders, ditchers, ballast regulators, rail grinders, tampers, curve liners, and stoneblowers | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1990 |
| 009 | railroad track maintenance machines, namely, rail flow detectors and rail analyzers | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |