Drawing for SMITTY

USPTO serial 74736425

SMITTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMITTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Carlson

RICHARD L CARLSON HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007mechanical and hydraulic lifting apparatus, namely, hoists and beams for use in raising construction materials to elevated work locations and replacement parts for use therewithABANDONEDFeb 19, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 17, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance