USPTO serial 74736791
BLIMPIE SUBS & SALADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 1997
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLIMPIE SUBS & SALADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
New York, NY
New York, NY
Scottsdale, AZ
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
ATLANTA, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Renee L. Mitchell
Renee L. Mitchell Ryley Carlock & ApplewhiteOne North Central AvenueSuite 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Metropolitan Blimpie, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KAHALA FRANCHISING, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Metropolitan Blimpie, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Conza, Anthony
- Other trademarks owned by KBI HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Conza, Anthony
- Other trademarks owned by Siegel, David
- Other trademarks owned by METROPOLITAN BLIMPIE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Metropolitan Blimpie, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Siegel, David
- Other trademarks owned by Siegel, David
- Other trademarks owned by Conza, Anthony
- Other trademarks owned by BLIMPIE INTERNATIOINAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BLIMPIE SUBS & SALADS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |