USPTO serial 74800048
RECEPTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 1994
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RECEPTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104, JP
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104, JP
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104, JP
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elmer Galbi
ELMER GALBI SEIKO TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC1625 N W AMBER GLEN COURT STE 140BEAVERTON, OR 97006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus to be worn on the wrist for receiving via radio signal and displaying, time of day and other messages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEICO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SEICO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SEICO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AT&E CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RECEPTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 17, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |