USPTO serial 74800344
MATTI VIIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 1992
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATTI VIIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S-191 05 Sollentuna, SE
S-191 05 Sollentuna, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Dippert
WILLIAM H DIPPERT KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, ET AL711 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shirts, pants, coats, jackets, vests, coveralls, sweaters, skirts, pullovers, footwear, and headgear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |