Drawing for AUSTRALIAN GOLD

USPTO serial 74800625

AUSTRALIAN GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUSTRALIAN GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032beer; non-alcoholic beer; non-alcoholic fruit based beverages; namely, de-alcohoized wine combined with one or more of the juices of oranges, apples, mangoes, passion fruit, pineapples, tomatoes and prunesABANDONEDMar 16, 1988
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY WINES AND BEERSABANDONEDMar 16, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 7, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jul 20, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1992DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 8, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance