Drawing for HYPER HYPER

USPTO serial 74800669

HYPER HYPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPER HYPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis J. Duffin

FRANCIS J DUFFIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003bubble bath, perfume, toilet soapsABANDONED—
014watches; jewelry, namely brooches, rings, pins, bracelets, chains, earrings, necklaces, all of precious metalsABANDONED—
016address books, photograph albums, gift wrapping paper, magazines dealing with fashion and interior design; stationery items, namely writing paper and envelopes; books dealing with fashion and interior design; calendars, playing cards, paper shopping bagsABANDONED—
035business management and consulting services, franchising services, namely offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of a retail fashion businessABANDONED—
042retail clothing store services, cafe services, catalog services in the field of fashion clothing, discount store services in the field of clothing, cameras, sporting goods, retail jewelry store services, distributorship services in the field of fashion clothingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 1993EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 1993EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 1, 1993EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 1993EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 1993EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 1992EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 19, 1992DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 1992EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 1992EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 1991EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 1991EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance